Educators Debate Academic Merits of Free Online Courses

As millions flirt with free college-level courses online, educators are still debating their academic merits.

Elite schools allow their professors to offer courses on Coursera, Udacity and edX, but so far, most aren’t willing to award students credit for those classes, which suggest that they’re not fully endorsing the pedagogy quite yet.

While the most sophisticated MOOCs—massive open online courses—go beyond a video lecture, some academics still question the quality of additional content such as quizzes and group discussions.

MOOC homework assignments are often different from those required in their classroom counterparts. For example, exams may require less analytical thinking—and some users say their online classmates lack the knowledge to contribute meaningfully to conversations. Using a peer-review model to grade essays, as Coursera has done, exposes similar issues.

And only a fraction of students—under 10% in most classes—makes it all the way through those massive online courses. That’s proof, some say, that MOOCs aren’t acceptable replacements for traditional classes.

“There’s a huge disconnect between the massive enthusiasm…and evidence of serious students who actually complete these courses,” said Carol Geary Schneider, president of the Association of American Colleges and Universities.

For their part, MOOC providers say that many students pick and choose lessons that interest them, and never have the intention of working all the way through the multiweek courses. However, they say they are trying to improve retention rates. That’s important not just for their reputations but also for their proposed revenue plans, as many are banking on selling certificates of completion or earning money by matching successful students with employers. <Read more.>

Via Melissa Korn and Jennifer Levitz, the Wall Street Journal.